PDP and Alan Greenspan - No Thank You!
PDP and Alan Greenspan - No Thank
You! By M.B.O Owolowo
I saw a picture of Alan Greenspan with PDP's
“commonsense” Senator and a notorious prevaricator famed for fake news
"Wendell Simlin” and it underpinned why PDP must not be given the
privilege of running Nigeria’s economy again.
If after 16 years of mismanaging Nigeria, Alan Greenspan is PDP's epiphanic
solution, then Nigerians are better off weathering the economic storm
ingeniously.
There are so many brilliant Nigerian and African
minds – neocolonialism free – across the globe, to engage for solutions to
Nigeria's challenges. I am convinced these brilliant minds would do a far
better job than a 92 year old man who has been widely blamed as a major
architect of one the worst financial crisis in world history - the 2008 global
financial crisis.
Personally, the global financial crisis affected
my business and investments, though it affected other people in more
devastating ways. There were thousands of economic suicides during this period.
Depression was rife and the crisis became known as the credit
crunch! Coincidentally, the 2008 global financial crisis and its immediate
aftermath occurred around the time I was doing my MBA at Imperial College
London, so it was a topical issue, with Alan Greenspan at the very heart.
In this regard, my MBA thesis concentrated on a dissective analysis of the
issue and proffering solutions to such financial crises.
I will quote some excerpts from my MBA thesis
below that summarise the genesis of the policy lapses that lead to the global
financial crisis. Whilst addressing regulatory ineffectiveness, I highlighted
the role of Alan Greenspan in the economic bubble - the boom and bust
cycle.
“The financial regulatory cartwheels have been ongoing for decades, yet
the economic crisis persists. There’s a limit to what regulations
can do within a system, if those being regulated persist with
unregulated activities – it's a systemic contraction. There may be
intrinsic motivational reasons behind certain actions of players within
financial institutions, which ought to be examined. I suspect there are
underlying socio-psychological factors causing these frequent
artificial bubbles - then the consequential boom and bust.
In behavioural finance terms, it's the herd mentality that leads to such
groupie styled behaviour, or in more extreme cases kleptomaniac oriented
reasoning.
For example, how does the concatenation of these regulations effectively
regulate psychologically motivated avidity or ebullience?
A similar financially related motive is the “irrational exuberance”
(Greenspan 1996), coined by the former Chairman of The
U.S Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. Irrational exuberance can be
described as investor enthusiasm that drives asset prices up to unsustainable
levels. Furthermore, such speculative activities contradict financial
fundamentals of qualitative and quantitative economic analysis, that assist in
the financial valuation of a company.
Ironically, even Greenspan's regulatory measure had counterproductive
implications. The Greenspan Put can be perceived as another example
of inherent systemic risks within the financial system. The term was
coined in 1998, following the lowering of interest rates by the
Federal Reserve, in response to the collapse of the hedge fund Long-Term
Capital Management - which involved a $3.5 billion bailout
supervised by the Federal Reserve.
The implication of the interest rate reduction by the Federal Reserve was that
investors could borrow funds cheaper and increase cash flows into the
securities market, through investments. It was basically the propping up
of the securities markets – the bubble.
The general assumption of investors was the ability to liquidate their
stocks at a specified price or before a future date as a put option.
Also, the investors assumed Greenspan would manipulate monetary policy to
maintain market stability. The eventuality was an
inevitable financial calamity - the bust.
In view of these events, Alan Greenspan was transmogrified from
the “hero” of the “Great Moderation” to the “villain”...”.
Interestingly, during Greenspan's grilling by a US
congressional committee in 2008, Greenspan admitted making a “mistake” by
“presuming” financial organisations were self-regulatory. That's coming
from the regulator!
To further buttress why Nigeria can frankly do
without the alliance between PDP and Alan Greenspan, I will quote the words of
the Chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), Phil Angelides:
“had his foot on the gas pedal as we drove over the cliff, and now he wants
to give the nation driving lessons once again.”
Nigeria has to make some tough economic decisions
going forward, so we need policies that reflect forwardness and not
backwardness. Considering how Nigeria got
into her mess, the country has been very fortunate to exit recession through
some fiscal discipline and fortuitous oil revenue increase. Admittedly, some
economic policies of Buhari-led APC government could have been better executed.
Nonetheless, going the way of a PDP with the services of Alan Greenspan is a
complete no-no, except of course Nigeria wants to be driven off the proverbial
“cliff”. On that note, I say thanks, but no thanks!
© M.B.O
2018
Email: m.b.o.owolowo@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment